Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Team hurt most by the 'hat trick rule' Options
dobbie
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:37:18 AM

Rank: Bench warmer

Joined: 4/23/2008
Posts: 27
Location: Undisclosed Secure Bunker
May as well start this forum out with some controversy.

Whaddya think?

It's either Alien Mike or Bearings, right?
alienhockey
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:44:31 AM

Rank: Bench warmer

Joined: 4/22/2008
Posts: 61
Location: GPS Coordinates: -93.740786,41.59878,0
I dont like the rule.
What if someone who normally doesn't have great games just "shows up" one game and can net 4 goals...is that bad?

I think Alien Joe is hurt most since we'll have to hold Topliff back.

Sad.


#66 - Alien Joe
#1 in Your Heart
dobbie
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 9:48:26 AM

Rank: Bench warmer

Joined: 4/23/2008
Posts: 27
Location: Undisclosed Secure Bunker
There's merit to your argument. A quick amendment to the rule may fix your concern.

Hat trick rule - Any B level player can only score 3 goals. A fourth intentional goal is a 2:00 minor, a game misconduct, and a season suspension, with a $100.00 fine payable to MISF.
THansenite
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:47:52 AM

Rank: Administration

Joined: 4/22/2008
Posts: 83
Location: In the crease
I agree. Last season, Stephanie got a hat trick in a game. She doesn't have a blazing shot, but she knows to hang out in front of the goal. It was only her second season on skates, but with this rule, she would almost be penalized for being in the right place at the right time.

However, on the flip side, last week's Bearings vs. Mike game had Brad Blickley scoring 3. It was nice for him to drop back and play D and allow someone else to skate up.

I like the modified rule of B players being limited to a hat trick, maybe even 2 goals to encourage more development for the C players (who the league is for anyway). A good B player on a team can completely change the outcome of a game with a few quick goals. However, I don't think Tim really cares about the skill level of players so wouldn't really know who is B level and who is C level.

QCI - Goalie #42
Killer Tomatoes - Mid-season Aquisition
Chops League - Skater
MISFit
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:22:37 PM

Rank: Bench warmer

Joined: 4/23/2008
Posts: 20
Location: alone inside a semi circle I own.
If players are "that good" where the number of goals they score needs to be limited to three, than they should be playing in B league. Otherwise just get rid of the rule. Bickley beat Alien Mike last week but it's no fun to play him when you know he has to pass because he already has 3 goals. Reminded me of like "T-Ball" or something.



Don't cross the line
#27 Alien Mike
Unrestricted Free Agent Goaltender
AlwaysCocaCola
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 2:23:22 PM

Rank: Rookie

Joined: 4/23/2008
Posts: 7
I dislike the rule too. But we did have a game where Josh scored 7 goals last season. That being said, I've been involved in a few beatdowns lately (on the losing end), and honestly it's WORSE when the other team plays down to your level. To me it feels like mockery kinda. I'm with the rest of you, if a player isn't at the right level for C league, then he shouldn't be playing C league. Good hard competition is what it's all about.
BMac
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 3:04:19 PM

Rank: Rookie

Joined: 4/23/2008
Posts: 8
Discussion forums - nice!

I'm pretty indifferent on the 3-goal rule, but while we're at it how about the new icing rule (only from behind your own blue line rather than from behind center). I can't figure out what the intent of that would be, other than to promote cherry-picking.
THansenite
Posted: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 3:55:48 PM

Rank: Administration

Joined: 4/22/2008
Posts: 83
Location: In the crease
BMac wrote:
Discussion forums - nice!

I'm pretty indifferent on the 3-goal rule, but while we're at it how about the new icing rule (only from behind your own blue line rather than from behind center). I can't figure out what the intent of that would be, other than to promote cherry-picking.


Yea, there is no reason for the new icing rule. It is going to get someone hurt because the puck is going to get dumped and players are going to chase it into the corners and get injured. Cherry picking wasn't terrible last season, but now, this is going to promote it. What was so bad with our old icing rule?

QCI - Goalie #42
Killer Tomatoes - Mid-season Aquisition
Chops League - Skater
BotWizo
Posted: Friday, April 25, 2008 1:42:59 PM

Rank: Rookie

Joined: 4/25/2008
Posts: 3
Location: Bearings Group
I would guess the intent of the new rule for icing is to decrease icing due to missed passes.

Players should not skate into corners out of control, or out of control into somone's back. Players remebering their skating ability should keep them from injury.

This is C league there will be no college schollarships or NHL contracts handed out at the end of the game.

I agree some of the rules are weird, but the icing one is not the worst.

Game over man... Game over! -- Pvt. Hudson
THansenite
Posted: Monday, April 28, 2008 9:42:51 PM

Rank: Administration

Joined: 4/22/2008
Posts: 83
Location: In the crease
That would encourage lazy play then. Why not have normal icing rules and make people more precise passers? And true, players shouldn't skate into corners out of control, but this rule encourages more skating for the puck in the corners. This could result in injuries happening regardless of their skating ability.

True, there are no contracts on the line, but it is still a competitive league. Personally, I see no reason for the change to the icing rule, especially since now we are supposed to have 2 refs per game.

QCI - Goalie #42
Killer Tomatoes - Mid-season Aquisition
Chops League - Skater
gr8dane
Posted: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:45:02 PM
Rank: Rookie

Joined: 4/30/2008
Posts: 4
Location: back of the net
Just wanted to chime in on the B league C league player debate. True, there are B level players in the league, and in some cases they take over games, which should not happen. In my opinion, a B level player, if playing the right way can help the development of some of the C level players with good passing, positioning, chatter, and advice. I personally like the hat trick rule.
dobbie
Posted: Thursday, May 01, 2008 8:46:58 AM

Rank: Bench warmer

Joined: 4/23/2008
Posts: 27
Location: Undisclosed Secure Bunker
The icing rules are great when you have a 1 goal lead and there's a couple minutes on the clock. Get to blue line and dump it. No whistle.

alienhockey
Posted: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 9:12:27 PM

Rank: Bench warmer

Joined: 4/22/2008
Posts: 61
Location: GPS Coordinates: -93.740786,41.59878,0
gr8dane wrote:
Just wanted to chime in on the B league C league player debate. True, there are B level players in the league, and in some cases they take over games, which should not happen. In my opinion, a B level player, if playing the right way can help the development of some of the C level players with good passing, positioning, chatter, and advice. I personally like the hat trick rule.


You like the hat trick rule..cuz you'll never see one...so no big deal for you. Guys like me that are superstars in the league are held back and I can't let the floodgates loose. I say we vote to have a 13 goal rule...because seriously, if you score more than 13 goals than you are too good for this league...or Shane is in net.


#66 - Alien Joe
#1 in Your Heart
gr8dane
Posted: Monday, May 12, 2008 2:04:55 PM
Rank: Rookie

Joined: 4/30/2008
Posts: 4
Location: back of the net
As of last week, I noticed you have a hard time getting it on net, let along scoring 13 goals. Trying to go top shelf all the time like your cousin, isn't your strong suit. Just worry about preventing goals. That is what you are good at.
alienhockey
Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 8:56:59 AM

Rank: Bench warmer

Joined: 4/22/2008
Posts: 61
Location: GPS Coordinates: -93.740786,41.59878,0
gr8dane wrote:
As of last week, I noticed you have a hard time getting it on net, let along scoring 13 goals. Trying to go top shelf all the time like your cousin, isn't your strong suit. Just worry about preventing goals. That is what you are good at.


ouch. that hurts.

#66 - Alien Joe
#1 in Your Heart
CapsFan
Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 10:55:28 AM

Rank: Rookie

Joined: 5/13/2008
Posts: 1
Location: At the rink
I didn't know about any of these rules. I think the three-goal rule suits me fine -- I won't score three goals all season the way I've been playing lately. The new icing rule is stupid. Hockey is hockey, next you'll be telling me offsides is only if a B-league player crosses the blue line before the puck. Is there a new website with up-to-date stats and schedules? I only see the game schedule through tomorrow on the MISF site -- how do I know what time the rest of our games are?

Pete MISF
THansenite
Posted: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:37:47 PM

Rank: Administration

Joined: 4/22/2008
Posts: 83
Location: In the crease
CapsFan wrote:
Is there a new website with up-to-date stats and schedules? I only see the game schedule through tomorrow on the MISF site -- how do I know what time the rest of our games are?


Yea, www.DMAHC.com is the rink's website for the leagues. They have all of the upcoming games on there. They were changing the schedule so much at the beginning of the season that I didn't want to put more than 5 weeks up because of the work involved if they changed it again. I don't know if I will keep standings updated or not on my site this season. Tim seems to not want me to despite me offering to do so. Next season, if Joe is back in charge, I hope he would want me to take the stats back over. We'll see though.

QCI - Goalie #42
Killer Tomatoes - Mid-season Aquisition
Chops League - Skater
Teal
Posted: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 11:19:34 AM

Rank: Bench warmer

Joined: 5/13/2008
Posts: 53
Location: driving Iowa county roads
I initially was against the 3 goal rule, but I'm starting to like it. When I saw the roster I wondered where our points would come from. I've decided they need to come from me. It's motivating me to work harder to someday register some points, since apparently feeding the puck to Mike to score on a breakaway doesn't count as an assist. I'm still not fond of getting a stick across my back because someone on the other team has scored his 3 goals and doesn't care if he gets sent to the penalty box, however.

As far as the icing goes, is it because of that rule change or that I moved up to C that there are a lot fewer whistles? I'm finding that I have to pay a lot more attention to my changes so I don't get stuck on the ice too long. Other than that it doesn't seem to make a huge difference either way, but I'd rather have it be like "real" hockey.

It's a short time livin' and a long time in the ground.
BotWizo
Posted: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:43:09 PM

Rank: Rookie

Joined: 4/25/2008
Posts: 3
Location: Bearings Group
THansenite wrote:
That would encourage lazy play then. Why not have normal icing rules and make people more precise passers? And true, players shouldn't skate into corners out of control, but this rule encourages more skating for the puck in the corners. This could result in injuries happening regardless of their skating ability.

True, there are no contracts on the line, but it is still a competitive league. Personally, I see no reason for the change to the icing rule, especially since now we are supposed to have 2 refs per game.



So agian,

The reason for the rule is to save time and let the game keep flowing. with a running clock if the game is stopped for faceoffs all of the time we have less time to play.

The rule is there since we are not good passers yet., and too keep the game enjoyable. If you want a more competitive league move up to B or A.

As far as injuries, I don't see how the rule increases your chance for injury. If you wanted icing like "real" hockey then we should have to touch up the puck and skate for it. So whistling it dead when it crosses the line is not like real hockey but makes it so we don't have to charge after a puck every time.

Game over man... Game over! -- Pvt. Hudson
alienhockey
Posted: Thursday, May 15, 2008 11:21:18 PM

Rank: Bench warmer

Joined: 4/22/2008
Posts: 61
Location: GPS Coordinates: -93.740786,41.59878,0
BotWizo wrote:
THansenite wrote:
That would encourage lazy play then. Why not have normal icing rules and make people more precise passers? And true, players shouldn't skate into corners out of control, but this rule encourages more skating for the puck in the corners. This could result in injuries happening regardless of their skating ability.

True, there are no contracts on the line, but it is still a competitive league. Personally, I see no reason for the change to the icing rule, especially since now we are supposed to have 2 refs per game.



So agian,

The reason for the rule is to save time and let the game keep flowing. with a running clock if the game is stopped for faceoffs all of the time we have less time to play.

The rule is there since we are not good passers yet., and too keep the game enjoyable. If you want a more competitive league move up to B or A.

As far as injuries, I don't see how the rule increases your chance for injury. If you wanted icing like "real" hockey then we should have to touch up the puck and skate for it. So whistling it dead when it crosses the line is not like real hockey but makes it so we don't have to charge after a puck every time.


Just to show the flipside...

If I'm Dylo on Alien Mike, I cross my blue line, "ice" the puck and outrace everyone because I'm the fastest skater and have more opportunities for scoring chances. The more traditional off sides eliminates some of that and "slows" down the faster skaters a bit.

Just looking at it from both sides.


#66 - Alien Joe
#1 in Your Heart
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

SoClean Theme Created by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.7 (NET v2.0) - 11/20/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.
This page was generated in 0.495 seconds.